Chapter Outline 9th Edition
- Introduction.
- People make daily choices to consume different types of media.
- The theory attempts to make sense of the fact that people consume an array of media messages for all sorts of reasons, and the effect of a given message is unlikely the same for everyone.
- The driving mechanism is need-gratification.
- Understanding the need helps to explain the reasons and the effects of media usage.
- People use media for their own particular purposes.
- The study of how media affect people must take account of the fact that people deliberately use media for particular purposes; this is Katz’s fundamental assumption.
- Audiences are not passive.
- Uses and grats emphasizes that media choices are personal.
- Exposure to media messages do not affect everyone in the same way, but fulfill different purposes at different times.
- People seek to gratify needs.
- The deliberate choices people make in using media are presumably based on the gratifications they seek from those media.
- There is not a straight-line effect where a specific effect on behavior can be predicted from media content alone, with no consideration of the consumer.
- The key to understanding media depends on which needs a person satisfies when selecting a media message.
- Media compete for your attention and time.
- Media competes with each other for your time as well as other activities that don’t involve media exposure.
- The need that motivates media consumption must be identified in an effort to understand why people make the choices they do.
- Media affect different people differently.
- Audiences are made up of people who are not identical.
- These differences determine the outcome or gratification a consumer receives.
- People can accurately report their media use and motivation.
- To discover why people consume media, they must be asked.
- Scholars have attempted to show that people’s reports of the reasons for their media consumption can be trusted, but this continues to be debated.
- A typology of uses and gratifications.
- Rubin’s typology of eight motivations can account for why most people watch TV.
- Passing time
- Companionship
- Escape
- Enjoyment
- Social interaction
- Relaxation
- Information
- Excitement
- Each category is relatively simplistic but can be further subdivided.
- Parasocial relationships: Using media to have a fantasy friend.
- Consumers develop a sense of friendship or emotional attachment with media personalities.
- Parasocial relationships can help predict how media will affect different viewers in different ways.
- In the same way uses & grats could be used to study TV-viewing, it also holds potential for studying social media.
- Critique: Heavy on description and light on prediction?
- Uses and gratification describes the typology of media uses and gratifications, but its lack of explanation and prediction is a serious weakness.
- Jiyeon So notes that uses & gratifications theory was never intended to be merely descriptive; it was originally designed to offer specific predictions about media effects.
- Scholars question the testability based on whether or not people can accurately report the reasons for their media use.
- Uses and grats does not offer much practical utility, whether users are active participants or not.
- Instead of staying with the simple assertion that media audiences were uniformly active and making conscious choices, Rubin modified the theory by claiming that activity was actually a variable in the theory.
- It’s now clear that uses and grats has generated a large body of quantitative research.
- Future studies need to focus on making testable predictions about media effects based on how media are used for this theory to be a stronger theory.